A Critical Assessment of Friedenwald's Technique for Estimating the Coefficient of Rigidity of the Cornea.

Purpose: To determine if Friedenwald's technique for estimating the coefficient of corneal rigidity (Ko, units mmHg/µL), could differentiate between the cornea in keratoconus, normal eyes, and after crosslinking (CXL). Methods: Two operators (1 and 2) independently measured Ko in three groups (keratoconus, normal, and post-CXL corneas), and repeated the procedure in some where their care remained unchanged and others after routine CXL (>28 days postop, epi-off treatment, 3.0 mW/cm2, 30 min). The data were subsequently used to quantify interoperator error, test-retest/intersessional reliability for estimation of Ko, the significance of intergroup differences, and the effect of CXL on Ko. Results: The major findings were: (i) Ko values were not normally distributed; (ii) mean (±sd, 95% CI) interoperator error was -0.002 (±0.019, -0.006 to 0.003, n = 95) and the limit of agreement between the operators was ±0.039; (iii) RMS differences in the intersessional estimation of Ko values were 0.011 (operator 1) and 0.012 (operator 2); (iv) intergroup differences in Ko were not significant (p > 0.05); (v) intersessional change in Ko (y) was linearly related to Ko estimated (x) at 1st session (for operator 2 y = 1.187x-0.021, r = 0.755, n = 16, p < 0.01); and (vi) change in Ko (y 1) after CXL was linearly related to Ko (x 1) at preop (for operator 2 y 1 = 0.880x 1-0.016, r = 0.935, n = 20, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Friedenwald's technique for estimating the Ko is prone to substantial interoperator error and intersessional differences. According to the technique, the change in Ko following CXL is on par with the expected intersessional change observed in controls.

Prevalence of keratoconus in refractive surgery practice population in North Macedonia.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of keratoconus (KC) in relation to ethnicity in a group of people who consulted an ophthalmological care institution seeking for refractive surgery in N. Macedonia. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, interventional retrospective study. Chart reviews were performed for all new patients attending between January 2016 and January 2020 at the Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital in Skopje. All patients were screened; KC diagnosis and classification were based on the corneal topography. Ethnicity and gender classifications were according to patients' self-opinions. RESULTS: A total of 2812 patients charts reviewed. The mean age was 31.71 years (SD ± 9.73), and 1209 (43%) were male. A total of 2050 (72.9%) declared themselves as Macedonians, 649 (23.1%) Albanians, 76 (2.7%) Turks and 37 (1.3%) in other ethnicities. Differences in age between the ethnic groups were statistically significant (x2 = 90.225, p < 0.001). KC was diagnosed in 343 patients (12.2%), while 9 (0.7%) were KC suspects and 6(0.21%) presented pellucid marginal degeneration. KC was more frequent in males (n = 246, 71.7% of total) and skewed toward younger patients. Increasing patients' age decreased the odds of KC diagnosis by 3.7% (95% CI 1.8%-4.4%) per annum. Males were four times more likely to be diagnosed with KC (AOR = 4.01; 95% CI 3.12-5.16). In comparison with Macedonian patients, Turks were more likely to be diagnosed with KC (AOR = 4.09; 95% CI 2.47-6.78). There was no difference between Macedonians and Albanians (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of KC at a refractive surgery practice in N. Macedonia is much higher compared with general population (6.8/100,000) and similar to the prevalence in Middle East Asia. Nationwide screening programs are needed to diagnose the disease earlier.

Comparison between the change in total corneal astigmatism and actual change in refractive astigmatism in transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and femtosecond laser assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FsLASIK).

PURPOSE: To compare changes in astigmatism by refraction and total corneal astigmatism after tPRK, LASIK and FsLASIK. SETTING: Specialty Eye Hospital Svjetlost, Zagreb, Croatia. DESIGN: Partially masked, semi-randomized, prospective, case-by-case, interventional, clinical study. METHODS: Patients with a stable refraction (-0.75DS to -8.00DS, astigmatism ≤1.00DC) underwent tPRK, LASIK or FsLASIK without complication. Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces over the central 3.2 mm zone (approximately using Pentacam HRTM) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Pentacam and refraction data were subjected to vector analysis to calculate the surgically induced changes in i) total corneal astigmatism (SIATCA) ii) any astigmatism by refraction (SIAR) and the vectorial difference (DV) between SIATCA and SIAR. RESULTS: Reporting key findings (p < .01), there was a significant difference between mean SIATCA and SIAR powers after tPRK (75eyes) but not after LASIK (100eyes) or FsLASIK (100eyes). Mean (±sd,95% CIs) values for DV powers were, tPRK -1.13DC(±0.71, -1.29 to -0.97), LASIK -0.39DC(±0.23,-0.44 to -0.34), FsLASIK -0.55DC(±0.38,-0.62 to -0.47). The differences were significant. For the tPRK and FsLASIK cases, linear regression revealed significant associations between I) SIATCA (x) &DV (z) powers (tPRK z = 1.586x-0.179, r = 0.767, p < .01; FsLASIK z = 0.442x-0.303, r = .484,p < .01), II) sines of SIATCA (x1) &DV (z1) axes (tPRK, z1 = 0.523 × 1 + 0.394, r = .650,p < .01; FsLASIK z1 = 0.460 × 1-0.308, r = .465,p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: tPRK is more prone to unintended changes in astigmatism. The difference between SIATCA & SIAR after tPRK or FsLASIK is mediated by SIATCA. Photoablating deeper regions of the cornea reduces the gap between SIATCA & SIAR.

A critical evaluation of longitudinal changes of astigmatism following implantation of toric implantable collamer lens (TICL): a comparison between treated and untreated cases over 4 years.

PURPOSE: To evaluate residual astigmatism following correction with toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) (group I) over a period of 4 years and compare with the change of astigmatism in spectacle wearers (group II). METHODS: Groups I (86 cases implanted with TICL [EVO + Visian ICL, Staar Surgical, Nidau, Switzeland], preop refractive error [sphere and cylinder] - 22.25 DS to - 1.00 DS and - 5.50 DC to - 1.00 DC) and II (80 cases initial refractive error [sphere and cylinder] - 18.00 DS to 0.00 DS and - 7.00 DC to - 1.00 DC) were reviewed annually. Refractive and tomography data were subjected to vector analysis to determine surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), angle of error [Δθ° = angle of target-induced astigmatism (TIA) - angle of SIA], and ΔC [TIA-SIA powers] and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) in group I and induced change in astigmatism (ICA) in group II. RESULTS: In group I, on all occasions, SIA correlated with TIA (p < 0.05); differences between SIA and TIA means were insignificant and changes in TCA were not correlated with ΔC. Mean (± sd, 95% CI) residual astigmatic powers (RA) in attending group I cases (1-4 years) were - 0.40 DC (0.58, - 0.52 to - 0.28), - 0.40 DC (0.59, - 0.52 to - 0.27), - 0.41 DC (0.58, - 0.54 to - 0.28), and - 0.61 DC (0.74, - 0.82 to - 0.40). In group II, the corresponding ICA powers were - 0.47 DC (0.53, - 0.61 to - 0.32), - 0.49 DC (0.48, - 0.69 to - 0.29), - 0.60 DC (0.40, - 0.76 to - 0.44), and - 0.86 DC (0.71, - 1.19 to - 0.52). Differences between RA and ICA were not significant. Of the group I cases presenting at 1-4 years postop, 23, 18, 16, and 28 had RA powers ≤ - 0.75 DC. Of these 12, 10, 6, and 16 were associated with Δθ° > 5° (ΔC - 0.50 to 0 DC) and 5, 1, 4, and 4 were related to ΔC (Δθ° < 5°). CONCLUSION: The development of astigmatism after TICL implantation is on par with the natural change in astigmatism in untreated cases. In about 50% of TICL cases presenting with astigmatism ≤ - 0.75 DC, the residual astigmatism could be neutralized by realigning the TICL.

The relationship between angle kappa and astigmatism after phacoemulsification with implanting of spherical and aspheric intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To determine the significance of any association between either change in angle kappa (Κ°) or the rectilinear displacement (L, mm) of the first Purkinje image relative to the pupil center and unexpected changes in astigmatism after phacoemulsification. METHODS: Orbscan II (Bausch and Lomb) measurements were taken at 1, 2, and 3 months after unremarkable phacoemulsification in patients implanted with spherical (group 1, SA60AT, Alcon) or aspheric (group 2, SN60WF, Alcon) nontoric IOLs. The outputs were used to calculate L. Astigmatism, measured by autorefractometry and subjective refraction, was subjected to vector analysis (polar and cartesian formats) to determine the actual change induced over the periods 1-2 and 2-3 months postop. RESULTS: Chief findings were that the mean (n, ±SD, 95%CI) values for L over each period were as follows: Group 1, 0.407 (38, ±0.340, 0.299-0.521), 0.315 (23, ±0.184, 0.335-0.485); Group 2, 0.442 (45, ±0.423, 0.308-0.577), 0.372 (26, ±0.244, 0.335-0.485). Differences between groups were not significant. There was a significant linear relationship between (A) the change in Κ (ΔΚ = value at 1 month-value at 2 months) and Κ at 1 month (x), where ΔΚ =0.668-3.794X (r = 0.812, n = 38, P = <0.001) in group 1 and ΔΚ = 0.263x -1.462 (r = 0.494, n = 45, P = 0.002) in group 2, (B) L and the J45 vector describing the actual change in astigmatism between 1 and 2 months in group 2, where J45 (by autorefractometry) =0.287L-0.160 (r = 0.487, n = 38, P = 0.001) and J45 (by subjective refraction) =0.281L-0.102 (r = 0.490, n = 38, P = 0.002), and (C) J45 and ΔΚ between 2 and 3 months in group 2, where J45 (by subjective refraction) =0.086ΔΚ-0.063 (r = 0.378, n = 26, P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Changes in the location of the first Purkinje image relative to the pupil center after phacoemulsification contributes to changes in refractive astigmatism. However, the relationship between the induced change in astigmatism resulting from a change in L is not straightforward.

Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review.

Recent evidence indicates that the corneal back surface astigmatism (CBSA) contributes to the refractive state of the eye in cataract surgery, especially with the implantation of toric intraocular lenses. But this has been met with some scepticism. A review of key studies performed over the past three decades shows that the mean CBSA power ranges from 0.18(±0.16)D to 1.04(±0.20)D. The clinical assessment of CBSA is problematic. There is poor agreement between the current automated systems for assessment of CBSA and it is assumed that these systems directly measure the CBSA. But CBSA cannot be measured directly in vivo. A historical review of methods used to quantify the curvature of the posterior corneal surface reveals that CBSA estimated by current systems is based on values for corneal front surface astigmatism, corneal refractive index, central corneal thickness, corneal thickness at peripheral locations and the exact distance between the corneal apex and each one of these peripheral locations. Doubts and errors in these values, coupled with the precise details of the algorithm incorporated to estimate CBSA, are the likely sources of the lack of agreement between current systems. These systematic errors cloud the assessment of CBSA. Mean CBSA may be low, but it varies from case to case. There is a clear need for a realistic, practical procedure for clinicians to independently calibrate systems for estimating CBSA. This would help to reduce uncertainty and the discrepancies between instruments designed to measure the same parameter.

Predicted and Measured Changes in Posterior Corneal Astigmatism after Uncomplicated Femtosecond Assisted LASIK (FsLASIK) and Microkeratome LASIK Correction for Myopia and Low Astigmatism.

Purpose: To compare predicted and measured changes in astigmatism at the posterior corneal surface (PCS) after FsLASIK or LASIK.Methods: Astigmatism was measured at both corneal surfaces (PentacamTM) before and 3 months after unremarkable FFsLASIK (roup 1,n = 100) or LLASIK (roup 2,n = 100) for myopia (-7.25DS to -0.75DS) and low astigmatism (≤1.00DC). Photoablation was achieved using Schwind Amaris750STM laser (Aberration Free profile, centered on corneal vertex). Pre-and postop astigmatic data, according to subjective refraction and estimates for the corneal surfaces (over the central 3.2 mm zone), were subjected to vector analysis to calculate surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) by refraction (SIAR), at the anterior (SIAFact) and posterior corneal surfaces (SIABact). The difference vector between SIAR and SIAFact was regarded as the predicted SIA at the PCS (SIABest).Results: Reporting key findings. Mean(±sd,95%CI) SIABest and SIABact powers in group 1 were -0.52DC(±0.35,-0.56 to -0.45) and -0.11DC(±0.08,-0.13 to -0.10) in group 1, -0.35DC(0.20,-0.39 to -0.32) and -0.08DC(0.07,-0.09 to -0.06) in group 2. Differences between SIABest and SIABact were significant for powers but not axes. Significant correlations(p < .01) were revealed between (I) SIAR and SIAFact powers [Group 1, SIAR = 0.370.SIAFact-0.292,r = 0.299. Group 2, SIAR = 0.484.SIAFact-0.394,r = 0.519] but not the axes and (II) ΔC (difference between pre-[x1] and postop measured PCS astigmatic powers) and x1 [Group 1, ΔC = 0.384x1 + 0.119,r = 0.423. Group 2, ΔC = 0.135x1 + 0.047,r = 0.229,p = .022]. There was no correlation between SIABest and SIABact powers or axes.Conclusion: The changes in posterior corneal astigmatic powers according to Pentacam measurements are small and do not account for the deficit between SIAR and SIAFact after FsLASIK or LASIK.

The effect of corneal crosslinking on the rigidity of the cornea estimated using a modified algorithm for the Schiøtz tonometer.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test a method for estimating corneal rigidity before and after cross-linking (CXL) using a Schiøtz tonometer. Methods: The study was performed in the Kyiv City Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital "Eye Microsurgical Center", Ukraine. This was a prospective, consecutive, randomized, masked, case-by-case, clinical study. Corneal rigidity, indicated by the gradient (G) between lg applied weight and corresponding lg scale reading during Schiøtz tonometry, were obtained by increasing (A-mode) then reducing (D-mode) weights by two operators [A] in keratoconus, post-CXL and control subjects for estimation of (i) interoperator and (ii) intersessional errors, (iii) intergroup differences; [B] before and after CXL. Central corneal thickness CCT was measured by scanning slit pachymetry. ANOVA, t tests, linear regression were the statistical tools used. Results: Average interoperator difference (ΔG) was -0.120 (SD = ±0.294, 95%CI = -0.175 to -0.066). A significant correlation between ΔG and the mean of each pair of G values was found (r = -0.196, n = 112, P = 0.038). Intersessional differences in mean G values were insignificant (P > 0.05). There was a significant correlation between G at first session (X1) and difference between sessions (ΔG) [Operator 1, ΔG = 0.598x1-0.461, r = 0.601, n = 27, P = 0.009]. Significant intergroup differences in G were found (Operator 1, one-way ANOVA, F = 4.489, P = 0.014). The difference (Δ) between the pre-(X2) and post-CXL treatment G values was significantly associated with the pre-CXL treatment value (Operator 1, Δ = 1.970x2-1.622, r = 0.642, n = 18, P = <.001). G values were correlated with CCT in keratoconus and post-CXL. Conclusion: Corneal rigidity (G) estimated using the Schiøtz tonometer can be useful for detecting changes after CXL. However, G values are linked to CCT, can vary from time-to-time and the procedure is operator dependent.

The influence of routine uncomplicated phacoemulsification on the orthogonality of the cornea.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of routine uncomplicated phacoemulsification on the orthogonal distribution of mass within the central optical zone of the cornea. Methods: Astigmatism at both corneal surfaces was evaluated using Orbscan II (Bausch &and Lomb) before and up to 3 months after routine phacoemulsification (one eye/patient). The data were subjected to vector analysis to estimate the pre-and postoperative total astigmatism of the cornea (TCA). Results: Reporting the chief findings in minus cylinder (diopters, DC) over the central 3 mm (A) and 5 mm (B) optical zones. Mean TCA powers (±sd) at pre- and 3-months postop were A) -4.45DC (±2.00) and -5.69DC (±2.69), B) -2.91DC (±2.22) and -2.71DC (±1.60). Change in mean power was significant over 3 mm (P < 0.01, n = 49) but not over 5 mm. Inter-zonal differences were significant (P < 0.01). There was a significant linear relationship between the change in TCA power (y = preoperative-postoperative) and TCA at preoperative stage (x) where, A) y = 0.45x + 3.12 (r = 0.336, n = 49, P = 0.018), B) y = x + 2.65 (r = 0.753, n = 49, P = <0.01). Over the central 3 mm zone only, change (preoperative-postoperative) in axis (°) of TCA (y1) was significantly associated with TCA axis at preoperative stage (x1) where y1 = 1.391x1-0.008x12-0.701 (r = 0.635, n = 49, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Changes in TCA power and axis at 3 months postop, determined using Orbscan II, are indicative of orthogonal alterations in the distribution of corneal tissue. Over the central 3 mm zone, the association between y1 and x1 shows that a change in TCA axis is more profound when preoperative axis is near 90° i.e., against-the-rule.

Are changes in visual acuity and astigmatism after corneal cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus predictable?

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), ratio of anterior and posterior corneal radii over the thinnest region of the cornea (ARC/PRC), and astigmatism after cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconus. METHODS: Subjective refraction and ARC/PRC (using Pentacam™) were monitored over 1 year in (I) keratoconus treated with routine CXL (n = 53), (II) relatively stable keratoconus (n = 23), and (III) age/gender matched controls (n = 24). RESULTS: CDVA (median, mode, interquartile range) improved significantly in group I, compared with groups II and III (p < 0.05), from 0.45 (0.60, 0.20-0.63) to 0.80 (0.95, 0.60-0.95); change in CDVA was associated with preop CDVA (p < 0.01 at all times postop). ARC/PRC (mean ± sd, 95% CI) changed from 1.362 (± 0.048, 1.347-1.377) to 1.425 (± 0.073, 1.401-1.449). CDVA and ARC/PRC remained stable in II and III. Significant relationships were revealed between logCDVA and ARC/PRC in I and II (at 12 months, I rs = - 0.464, II rs - 0.449) and logCDVA at postop(y), log CDVA at preop(x1), and ARC/PRC at preop(x2) in I (at 12 months, y = 0.356x1 - 1.312x2 + 1.806, r21 = 0.494, r22 = 0.203). Astigmatic power (mean ± sd, 95% CI) improved from - 3.10DC (± 1.52, - 3.55 to - 2.66) to - 2.53DC (± 1.24, - 2.90 to - 2.17) in I, and worsened from - 1.27DC (± 1.32, - 1.81 to - 0.73) to - 1.61DC (± 1.28, - 2.13 to - 1.09) in II. Vector analysis revealed in group I (a) the power of the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was linked to astigmatic power at preop and (b) the difference between the axis of astigmatism at preop(ø) and the axis of the SIA was linked to ø. CONCLUSION: CXL improved CDVA, increased the ARC/PRC ratio, and modified the association between CDVA and ARC/PRC. The change in CDVA was linked to preop CDVA and ARC/PRC values. The association between SIA and preop astigmatism implies there is not a simple cause and effect relationship with CXL.

The relationship between patient age and residual refractive error after uneventful laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate-to-high hyperopia.

PURPOSE: To determine if the manifest sphero-cylindrical residual refractive error, at various time points over a 12-month postop period after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was associated with patient age at time of surgery. METHODS: Patients with moderate to high hyperopia (3.00-7.00 DS) and astigmatism ⩽2 DC underwent LASIK using Wavelight Allegretto Eye Q (400 Hz). Treatments were centered on corneal vertex, flaps were made with Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome. Pre-and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity, best corrected spherical equivalent (SEQ) were measured. Measurements were taken at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. Target refraction was emmetropia. Total of 161 patients were treated. In binocular cases, data from the right eyes were included for analysis. In this article, we report on refraction data only. Raw data were subjected to several permutations to elicit any links between refractive outcomes and patient age. RESULTS: The key findings were as follows y = postop SEQ (diopters), x = patient age (years), ln(x) = natural logarithm of patient age: At 1 month, y = x[0.049 -0.011.ln(x)] (R = -0.205, p = 0.001, n = 161). At 3 months, y = x[0.077 -0.017.ln(x)] (R = -0.355, p < 0.001, n = 161). At 6 months, y = x[0.088 -0.020.ln(x)] (R = -0.382, p < 0.001, n = 161). At 12 months, y = x[0.093 -0.021.ln(x)] (R = -0.409, p < 0.001, n = 161). There was no significant association between x and y at 1 week (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Residual postop refractive error after LASIK for hyperopia has a logarithmic association with patient age at time of surgery. In younger patients there is tendency toward undercorrection, the opposite occurs in older patients and this persists 1 year after treatment.

The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To determine the significance of any association between intersessional changes in ocular residual astigmatism (RA) and astigmatism at corneal front (FSA) and back (BSA) surfaces following uneventful routine phacoemulsification. METHODS: Astigmatism was evaluated by autorefractometry and subjective refraction and at both the corneal surfaces with Orbscan II™ (Bausch & Lomb) over central 3 mm and 5 mm optical zones at 1, 2, and 3 months after routine phacoemulsification in 103 patients implanted with monofocal nontoric intraocular lenses (IOLs, one eye/patient). Data were subjected to vector analysis to determine the actual change (Δ) in astigmatism (power and axis) for the refractive and Orbscan II findings. RESULTS: The number of cases that attended where ΔRA was ≥0.50 DC between 1 and 2 months was 52 by autorefractometry and 36 by subjective refraction and between 2 and 3 months was 24 by autorefractometry and 19 by subjective refraction. Vector analysis revealed significant correlations between ΔFSA and ΔRA for data obtained by autorefractometry but not by subjective refraction. At all times, ΔBSA was greater than ΔFSA (p < 0.01). Key findings for ΔBSA values over the central 3 mm zone were between (A) the sine of the axis of ΔRA (y) and sine of the axis of ΔBSA (x) for the data obtained by autorefractometry (between 1 and 2 months, y = 0.749 - 0.303x, r = 0.299, n = 52, p=0.031) and subjective refraction (between 2 and 3 months, y = 0.6614 - 0.4755x, r = 0.474, n = 19, p=0.040) and (B) ΔRA (y) and ΔBSA (x) powers between 2 and 3 months postoperatively for the data obtained by autorefractometry (ΔRA = 0.118 ΔBSA + 0.681 r = 0.467, n = 24, p=0.021) and subjective refraction (ΔRA = 0.072 ΔBSA + 0.545 r = 0.510, n = 19, p=0.026). CONCLUSION: Changes in the ocular residual refractive astigmatic error after implanting a monofocal nontoric IOL are associated with changes in astigmatism at the back surface of the cornea within the central optical zone.

Vector Analysis of Changes in the Higher Order Ocular Aberrations and Central Corneal Thickness After T-PRK and Fs-LASIK.

INTRODUCTION: Refractive surgery procedures, transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) are regarded as safe and efficacious methods for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. These two methods do not have much differences in results when treating spherical myopia, while some differences does exist in treatment of myopic astigmatism. Vector analysis presents powerful tool to show the real differences between these two methods regarding higher order ocular aberrations and central corneal thickness of treated eyes. AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate changes in higher order ocular aberrations (HOAs) and central corneal thickness (CCT) following treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism above -5.00DS and up to -2.00DC after either T-PRK or Fs-LASIK. METHODS: Patients (30 eyes per group) underwent T-PRK (group I) or Fs-LASIK (group II) procedure using Schwind Amaris 750S laser. HOAs (3mm&5mm pupil) and CCT were measured objectively at pre-, 1,3 & 6 months postop in each case. RESULTS: Key results at 6 months were: i) mean values of trefoil (5mm pupil) were 0.092µm (sd,0.055,95% CI 0.072 to 0.112) & 0.126µm (sd,0.078,95% CI 0.098 to 0.154) in group I, and 0.088µm (sd,0.058,95% CI 0.067 to 0.109) & 0.064µm (sd,0.034,95% CI 0.052 to 0.076) in group II (P=0.001 at 6 months); ii) Changes in CCT (ΔCCT) and best spherical equivalent correction (ΔBSE) was significant in group II (ΔCCT=-26.55[ΔBSE]-14.06,R=0.486,P=0.006) but not in group I (p=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: After T-PRK trefoil is worse than Fs-LASIK. The predictability of corneal changes is better following Fs-LASIK. .

The relationship between clinical measures of aniseikonia and stereoacuity before and after LASIK / Relación entre las mediciones clínicas de aniseiconía y estereoagudeza antes y después de la cirugía LASIK

PURPOSE: To determine the significance of changes and and inter-relationships between three markers of binocular function (aniseikonia, distance and near stereoacuity) following unremarkable LASIK at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: All patients underwent LASIK using the Schwind Amaris 750S and the flaps were created using Intralase 150 kHz. Patients were I, monocular myopes II, binocular myopes III, binocular hyperopes IV, binocular astigmats V, anisometropes and VI, matched age and gender control (n = 20 in each group except III where n = 18). Aniseikonia (Awaya test), distance and near stereoacuity (Randot tests) were measured before surgery, and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. At all times data were collected under constant conditions and analyzed using appropriate non-parametric statistical tests. RESULTS: The following statistically significant changes were found after applying the Bonferroni correction (p ≤ 0.001); aniseikonia reduced (groups I, III, IV, V), stereoacuity improved at distance (groups I, III-V) and near (groups I, V). Inter-group differences in aniseikonia distance and near stereoacuity were significant preoperatively, but not postoperatively. In groups I, IV and V, the changes in aniseikonia and stereoacuity (near and distance) were significantly correlated with the preoperative value. Aniseikonia was significantly correlated with distance and near stereoacuity preoperatively but not postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Binocular function improved in all groups after LASIK except in binocular myopes. In general, binocular function was still low compared with the control group at six months postoperatively. It is unclear why binocular function improved in the binocular astigmats

OBJETIVO: Determinar la significancia de cualquier cambio, así como las interrelaciones entre tres marcadores de la función binocular (aniseiconía, estereoagudeza de lejos y de cerca) tras LASIK sin complicaciones a los 3 y 6 meses postoperatorios. MÉTODOS: A todos los pacientes se les realizó cirugía LASIK con el laser Schwind Amaris 750S, creándose los flaps con Intralase 150 kHz. Los grupos de pacientes fueron: I miopes monoculares, II miopes binoculares, III hipermétropes binoculares, IV astígmatas binoculares, V anisométropes y VI controles equivalentes en edad y género (n = 20 en cada grupo, exceptuando III donde n = 18). Se midió la aniseiconía (prueba de Awaya), la estereoagudeza de lejos y de cerca (pruebas Randot) durante el preoperatorio, y a los 3 y 6 meses posteriores a la cirugía. En todo momento se recabaron los datos en condiciones constantes, analizándose los mismos con pruebas estadísticas no paramétricas adecuadas. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron los siguientes cambios estadísticamente significativos tras aplicar la corrección de Bonferroni (p ≤ 0,001); se redujo la aniseiconía (grupos I, III, IV, V), y mejoró la estereoagudeza de lejos (grupos I, III-V) y de cerca (grupos I, V). Las diferencias inter-grupo en cuanto a aniseiconía de lejos y de cerca y la estereoagudeza de cerca fueron significativas en el preoperatorio, pero no en el postoperatorio. En los grupos I, IV y V, los cambios en cuanto a aniseiconía y estereoagudeza (de cerca y de lejos) guardaron una correlación significativa con el valor preoperatorio. La aniseiconía guardó una correlación significativa con la estereoagudeza de lejos y de cerca en el preoperatorio, pero no el postoperatorio. CONCLUSIÓN: La función binocular mejoró en todos los grupos tras la cirugía LASIK, excepto en la miopía binocular. En general, la función binocular fue aún baja al compararse con el grupo control a los seis meses postoperatorios. No queda claro por qué la función binocular mejoró en el astigmatismo binocular

The impact of exposure on the magnitude of astigmatism formed within the precorneal tear film over the central optical zone of the cornea in ocular surface disease.

PURPOSE: To estimate the astigmatic power and axis of the tear film over the central optical zone of the cornea by vector analysis of topographic data, in ocular surface disease (OSD) and controls, during blink suppression. METHODS: Video-keratoscopic images were captured on opening the eyes after a single blink 5, 10 & 15 s later during blink suppression in OSD patients (mixed aetiology, group 1 age 20 - 50 years, n = 12, group 2 > 50 years, n = 38) and controls (group 3, n = 19). The SimK and axis values were used to calculate the astigmatism (power and axis) that formed in the precorneal tear film during each period. Data were aggregated into 3 periods; T0-T5 (between 0 & 5 s after the blink), T5-T10 (5 & 10 s later, T10-T15 (between 10 & 15 s later). RESULTS: Mean (± SD, 95%CI) astigmatic power (DC) formed in the tear film over each period was respectively : Group 1, -0.81 DC (0.99, -1.44 to -0.17), -2.65 DC(1.36, -3.52 to -1.79), -1.37 DC (2.15, -2.73 to -0.01). Group 2, -0.33 DC (0.38, -0.45 to -0.20), -0.57 DC (0.97, -0.91 to -0.24) -0.96 DC (2.10, -1.68 to -0.24), Group 3, -0.57 DC (0.55 -0.76 to -0.38), -0.56 DC (0.57, -0.76 to -0.37), -0.31 DC (0.44, -0.46 to -0.16). Changes were significant in groups 1 (p = 0.013) & 3 (p = 0.033) but not in 2 (p = 0.078). Intergroup differences were significant at all periods (p < 0.05). Significant correlations were detected following vector analysis, e.g Group2 between the astigmatism formed during T5-T10 (y) and ocular surface astigmatism at 5 s was y = 0.281x - 0.834 (r = 0.328, n = 38, p < 0.05). In all three groups apparent changes in the axes of astigmatism were not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the precorneal tear film after blinking are predominately astigmatic indicating that changes in the central region of the tear film following the natural blink are quasi-orthogonal.

The relationship between clinical measures of aniseikonia and stereoacuity before and after LASIK.

PURPOSE: To determine the significance of changes and and inter-relationships between three markers of binocular function (aniseikonia, distance and near stereoacuity) following unremarkable LASIK at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: All patients underwent LASIK using the Schwind Amaris 750S and the flaps were created using Intralase 150 kHz. Patients were I, monocular myopes II, binocular myopes III, binocular hyperopes IV, binocular astigmats V, anisometropes and VI, matched age and gender control (n = 20 in each group except III where n = 18). Aniseikonia (Awaya test), distance and near stereoacuity (Randot tests) were measured before surgery, and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. At all times data were collected under constant conditions and analyzed using appropriate non-parametric statistical tests. RESULTS: The following statistically significant changes were found after applying the Bonferroni correction (p ≤ 0.001); aniseikonia reduced (groups I, III, IV, V), stereoacuity improved at distance (groups I, III-V) and near (groups I, V). Inter-group differences in aniseikonia distance and near stereoacuity were significant preoperatively, but not postoperatively. In groups I, IV and V, the changes in aniseikonia and stereoacuity (near and distance) were significantly correlated with the preoperative value. Aniseikonia was significantly correlated with distance and near stereoacuity preoperatively but not postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Binocular function improved in all groups after LASIK except in binocular myopes. In general, binocular function was still low compared with the control group at six months postoperatively. It is unclear why binocular function improved in the binocular astigmats.

Cross-linking treatment for better visual acuity.

Aim To correlate the maximum anterior sagittal curvature (Kmax) changes and uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in keratoconus patients after the cross-linking (CXL) procedure. Methods Forty-four eyes of 34 patients with keratoconus were analysed after the standard Dresden protocol CXL procedure had been performed. All patients underwent complete preoperative examination with a follow-up of 12 months with focus on UDVA, CDVA and Oculus Pentacam (Scheimpflug technology) analysis. We analysed and correlated Kmax changes in the postoperative period of 12 months together with visual acuity changes. Results Visual acuity improved significantly in the first 3 months after the procedure and even more significantly until the end of the first year. Even Kmax is the most relevant and most followed parameter for progression and regression of keratoconus, its lowering was not directly correlated with the visual acuity improvement (both uncorrected and corrected) in the first 6 months after corneal CXL procedure. Kmax was changed significantly in the period of 12 months post cross linking, but not in the first 6 months. Conclusion Corneal CXL should be considered as a procedure not just for corneal stiffening and stabilization, but also for visual acuity improvement in keratoconus patients.

Treatment of High Astigmatism with WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q Excimer Laser Platform.

INTRODUCTION: The WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q is a flying-spot excimer laser, with a pulse repetition rate of 400Hz, with two galvanometric scanners for positioning laser pulses. The system has an infrared high speed camera operating at 400Hz to track the patient's eye movements that either compensates for changes in eye position or interrupts the treatment if the eye moves outside a preset predetermined range. AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz laser delivery platform aimed to correct astigmatism by subjecting the pre and postoperative astigmatic values to vector analysis. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups, depending on the type of astigmatism. Astigmatism was between 2 and 7 diopters (D). A total of 188 eyes (110 patients), 127 eyes (71 patients) with myopic astigmatism and 61 eyes (39 patients) with mixed astigmatism underwent unremarkable LASIK correction on WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz. The preoperative and postoperative sphere, negative cylinder [C] and axis (ø) of manifest refractions were subjected to vector analysis by calculations of the standard J0 (cos [4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2) and J45 (sin[4π(ø-90)/ 360]xC/2). RESULTS: Reporting the key results, we found that J0 significantly reduced after LASIK (p<0.001) but not J45. There was no significant association between individual pairs of pre and postoperative J0 &J45 values. CONCLUSION: WaveLight Allegretto 400Hz showed excellent results for treating patients with high astigmatism, regardless whether it is mixed or myopic astigmatism. The J45 did not reduce significantly possibly because of the low number of eyes with oblique astigmatism. There was no genuine difference postoperatively between groups treated on WaveLight Allegretto platform according to the vector analyses.

Changes in Endothelial Cell Count Up to Three Years After Implantation of Toric Implantable Collamer Lenses.

PURPOSE: To determine the temporal effect of toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) implantation and location on corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) over a period of 36 months after surgery. METHODS: ECD [number of cells per square millimeter estimated using the Specular Microscope SP-1P (Topcon Europe Medical B.V., Netherlands)] data were collected from cases deemed suitable for the TICL (VTICMO, VTICM5; STAAR Surgical, Nidau, Switzerland). The preoperative refractive error (sphere and cylinder) ranged from -1.00 to -22.25 diopter sphere and from -0.50 to -5.50 diopter cylinder. ECD was evaluated at preoperative and all postoperative sessions. RESULTS: Key findings were as follows: the mean ECD (±SD, 95% confidence interval) was 2720 cells/mm (±272, 2620-2820 cells/mm) preoperatively, which was reduced to 2372 cells/mm (±325, 2250-2490 cells/mm) at 36 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). Linear regression revealed the following significant correlations between the (1) log of the change in ECD (y1) and log of preoperative ECD (x1) at 2 years postoperatively, y1 = 2.513x1-6.2816 (n = 62, r= 0.3503, P = 0.005); (2) mean ECD (y2) and log time (in months, x2), y2= 2543.7-36.997x2-38.99x2 (r=-0.9654, n = 7, P = 0.0004); and (3) mean axial distance between the front surface of the crystalline lens and the TICL back surface (y3) and time postoperatively (in months, x3), y3 = 0.1035x3-5.2808x3 +473.18 (r = 0.8512, n = 7, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Expected ECD loss after TICL implantation by 2 years postoperatively is predictable. On average, over 3 years after implantation, there is (1) an initial rapid decline in ECD, followed by a gradual fall in the rate of cell loss, and (2) a gradual fall in the distance between the TICL and the crystalline lens by 2 years postoperatively, followed by a reversal by the third year.

The refractive index of the human cornea: A review.

The refractive index of the cornea and overlying tear film are key factors affecting refraction and overall optical properties of the eye. A figure of 1.376 is often quoted for the refractive index of the human cornea over the visible spectrum. In the 19th century estimates for the average refractive index of the human cornea ranged from 1.335 to 1.4391. Over the last two decades data obtained from either ex or in vivo corneas (under local anaesthesia with or without stromal resection) by contact Abbé refractometry show the refractive index of the cornea changes along its' depth undulating from around 1.400 at the epithelium to 1.380 at Bowman's layer, a low of 1.369 in the mid stroma and 1.373 at the endothelium. The mean refractive index of harvested tear samples is 1.337 rising to 1.482 for the overlying lipid layer. Contemporary measurements obtained in vivo by non-invasive methods reveal the average, or equivalent, refractive index of the tear film-cornea complex along the antero-posterior direction ranges from 1.423 to 1.436. Over the last 200 years calculations, with respect to the optics of the human eye, were based on values for the refractive index of the cornea obtained from invasive techniques. The refractive index of the cornea and overlying tear film appears to be higher than previously accepted and varies from case to case.